Wilde found a way to marry the role of rebel and dandy.By liberating English literature from its Victorian preconceptions, he helped align British culture with the modernist values emerging on the European continent.

Wilde used the Aesthetic doctrine to promote the cult of beauty and pleasure and, as the physical embodiment of that ideal, he promoted hedonism as the way out of repressive Victorian culture and society.Guided by this maxim, Wilde did more than any other to cultivate the modern idea that art, as a pure product of the senses, could 'prevent the death of the human soul'. Wilde's name is routinely linked with Théophile Gautier's famous maxim ' Arte per amore dell' Arte' ( art for art's sake).But perhaps it was his flair for self-publicity and his oft-quoted witticisms that his name truly endures in the consciousness of the public. Wilde's star, which today burns brightest within the gay/queer community, has never diminished, however, and his legacy - exemplified by two classics of English literature, the Gothic novel The Picture of Dorian Gray and the stage satire, The Importance of Being Earnest - prevails through screen biographies and countless reinterpretations of his works. Ruined physically and financially, he lived out the final few years of his life in Paris, dying aged just 46. He was halted at the height of his fame when sentenced to three years imprisonment for illegal homosexual activity. At the same time, Wilde attracted public notoriety for his stream of witty aphorisms and his 'effeminate' long hair, dandyish clothing and his devotion to flowers.

He won fame as a dramatist, poet and novelist whose ideas on art, beauty and personal freedom formed a formidable challenge to Victorian puritanicalism. Romeo and Juliet, Oedipus Rex), and I felt like you might as well just read the biblical version and not bother with Wilde's retelling.Oscar Wilde emerged in late nineteenth century London as the living embodiment of the Aesthetic movement. What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?ĭisappointment.I didn't really find it that scandalous, it wasn't funny, it didn't even hit the right notes for tragedy (i.e. The narrators do a good job of giving the characters a unique voice and adding emotional subtext, but unfortunately the story is just lame. What does the narrators bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book? Even if I didn't have my own expectations set high because of my love of his other plays, I still wouldn't have liked it. I was expecting more of his usual wit, and perhaps something more of comedy noire. What could Oscar Wilde have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you? I couldn't care less about the characters and didn't find the dialogue witty or amusing at all. This play was touted as being scandalous for its time period, and maybe it was, but in this day and age it's just dull.

Salomé by oscar wilde